Assessment
Plan
Academic Program:
Program Chair or Director:
Date:
Instructions: Use this form to summarize your academic assessment plan. Attach any documents that explain aspects of the plan in greater detail. Note: Begin with what you want to know: do students learn what you want them to learn? Do you have specific questions about your program that you want to answer? Assess what matters most to you and your department.
Example:
| How their learning will be assessed [2] |
How results will be analyzed and by whom [3] |
Assessment schedule [4] |
See attached documents | |
|
Communicate
in writing |
Student
portfolios |
Curriculum
Committee review at end of semester; writing
rubric |
Spring
2003, 2005, 2007 |
A: Portfolio
directions for students B: assessment
rubric |
|
Solve
problems |
Capstone
course project |
Capstone
instructors, end of semester; problem-solving
rubric |
Spring
2004, 2006, 2008 |
C: Project
Instructions D:
rubric |
|
Apply
knowledge to real world situations |
Internship |
Internship
supervisor evaluations, reviewed by all Department faculty; specific
applications evaluated |
Every
semester |
E: Internship
evaluation form |
|
Know
content of the field |
Selected
questions embedded in course evaluations |
Reviewed
by all Department faculty, using scale of 1-5 for each content
area. |
Results
from three different courses reviewed each
semester. |
F: Sample test
questions |
|
Able
to assess self reflectively |
Exit
interview |
Notes
of interviewers summarized for the faculty |
Every
spring semester. |
G: Key interview
prompts |
|
Perform
successfully after graduation |
Alumni
survey |
1st
and 5th year graduates assessed by mailed
survey |
2005
and 2010 |
H: Previous alumni
survey |
Note: All results will be discussed with recommendations made by the entire faculty at the beginning of the Fall semesters.
[1] In the literature of assessment, these are usually referred to as “learning outcomes.” If "learning outcome" is to jargony for you, think of it as "evidence of student learning." What should students be able to do, know, or value? However, you may really want to know the answer to a question you have about your program. E.g., Can our students solve a problem in our discipline if they've never heard of this problem before? Why aren't our students as committed to the subject as we'd like them to be? Can seniors write better than freshmen? And so on.
2One or more methods may be used for each learning outcome, question, or issue. When possible, direct assessments of student work should be used for assessment, but indirect methods may help flesh out the overall assessment. Direct methods include portfolios, work in capstone courses, embedded work such as research papers and examination answers, and student creative products such as art, dance, theatre, and writing.
3More than one faculty member should assess student work, not just the instructor of a course. Methods might include evaluations using rubrics or written summaries or statistical analyses.
4Some assessments should occur every year, but not everything needs to be assessed every year. Develop a cycle of assessment that might be one to three years long. Allow additional assessments to be developed as additional questions arise about student learning.
Assessment
Plan
Academic Program:
Program Chair or Director:
Date:
Instructions: Use this form to summarize your academic assessment plan. Attach any documents that explain aspects of the plan in greater detail.
| What students should learn
[6]
|
How their learning will be assessed
[7]
|
How results will be analyzed and
by whom
[8]
|
Assessment schedule
[9]
|
See attached documents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] In the literature of assessment, these are usually referred to as “learning outcomes.” What should students be able to do, know, or value?
[2] One or more methods may be used for each learning outcome. When possible, direct assessments of student work should be used for assessment, but indirect methods may help flesh out the overall assessment. Direct methods include portfolios, work in capstone courses, embedded work such as research papers and examination answers, and student creative products such as art, dance, theatre, and writing.
[3] More than one faculty member should assess student work, not just the instructor of a course. Methods might include evaluations using rubrics or written summaries or statistical analyses.
[4] Some assessments should occur every year, but not everything needs to be assessed every year. Develop a cycle of assessment that might be one to three years long. Allow additional assessments to be developed as additional questions arise about student learning.
[6] In the literature of assessment, these are usually referred to as “learning outcomes.” What should students be able to do, know, or value?
[7] One or more methods may be used for each learning outcome. When possible, direct assessments of student work should be used for assessment, but indirect methods may help flesh out the overall assessment. Direct methods include portfolios, work in capstone courses, embedded work such as research papers and examination answers, and student creative products such as art, dance, theatre, and writing.
[8] More than one faculty member should assess student work, not just the instructor of a course. Methods might include evaluations using rubrics or written summaries or statistical analyses.
[9] Some assessments should occur every year, but not everything needs to be assessed every year. Develop a cycle of assessment that might be one to three years long. Allow additional assessments to be developed as additional questions arise about student learning.