The structure of the midterm is as follows:
4 of 6 identification terms—define the term, explain its significance, and give an example. (5 points each)
Answer 2 of the short essay questions. You get to choose one; I get to choose the other. (20 points each)
Some advice for essay questions
1. Make a coherent argument in response to each question. Make sure you answer each sub-question and relate it back to the larger argument.
2. Use the readings and authors’ names in your answer.
3. Use specific examples to support your arguments.
4. Make sure to define the concepts you use in your answers.
You essay answers will be evaluated based upon
1. the clarity of your argument
2. the use of the readings and lectures
3. the creative use of examples from lectures, case studies, presentations, and readings to make your arguments
Madison and Hamilton’s views states will always retain the balance of power against the federal government.
James Bryce’s view of assimilation
Devolution revolution
Constitutional basis of federalism
Dual federalism, layer cake model
Marble cake federalism
Commerce clause
Why the GOP devolution revolution has fizzled
Internet taxation
Examples of GOP power grab
How GOP congressional mandates differ from Democrat congressional mandates
Tragedy of the commons
Race to the bottom
Race to the top, California effect
Corporate chartering, Delaware
Gambling, Iowa
Nathan’s view of federalism
Opportunistic federalism
Federalism as providing an “ideological balancing role”
Dilger- how national grants to states have changed
preemption
Marriage, Defense of Marriage Act and Nevada
Gray’s socioeconomic explanation of politics
Population growth, population in poverty, location, climate, natural resources, per capita income
State ranking on policy indicators
changing pattern of immigration
internal migration trends
Elazar’s political culture model of politics
origins of state political cultures
Individualistic cultures
Moralistic subcultures
Traditionalistic culture
Hero/Tolbert’s Racial Ethnic Diversity Interpretation
Bifurcated state
Heterogeneous state
Homogenous state
Hero/Tolbert critique of state political cultures
Hero/Tolbert critique of moralistic states concern for “commonwealth”
1. What are the origins of the three political cultures posited by Daniel Elazar? Does what you know about the politics in your state confrom to the arguments he makes? What forces may have contributed to a blending of these three cultures over time? Have any forces worked to keep the cultures distinct?
Discuss the various structural changes states have undertaken to make mass participation easier and to increase officeholder diversity
Impact of districting on the racial/ethnic/gender makeup of collegial bodies
Majority minority districts impact on representation of black interests in Mississippi
At large (AL) vs. single member districts (SMDs)
Cumulative Voting
Trends in officeholder diversity
resurgence of state parties
state parties as service agency
elements of party institutionalization
legislative campaign committees
nationalization of state parties
consequences of strengthened state parties
Parties as networks of issue oriented activists
Candidate centered politics
VO Key’s views on the problems of 1 party system
VO Key’s views on the demise of 1 party system in south
The demise of Idaho Democrats
Politics of parity
Video poker in Alabama
Prison guards in California
When do interest groups or interest system result in positive contributions of lobbying and when do they corrupt politics and bias public policy?
How and why has interest group activity changed since the 1970s and since the 1990s? What is driving these changes?
How are political parties and interest groups in competition with each other? Why do they sometimes cooperate?
Section II. Short
Essay Questions. You choose one, I
choose 1. Note, the short amount of time per question rewards those who are able to
make their arguments in a quick and concise fashion sans BS. Please make sure to refer specifically to the
readings and examples from class presentations in making your arguments.