Skidmore College
Standards and Expectations/
Writing--In-The-Disciplines
Workshop III:
Creating Writing-In-The-Disciplines Resources
28 May-31 May 2002
|
Writing Expectations |
|
|
Expectations
Developed in Summer 2001 Workshop Workshop participants articulated the following criteria for assessing college writing after reading and discussing a selection of course papers from LS 2 classes written by students who had completed the Expository Writing Requirement. Audience: writing to the audience; awareness of audience; tone and vocabulary shift in response to audience Authority: writing with a sense of certainty about the content; recognizing you can engage with and criticize the subject; critical understanding of material (more than saying just what the book said or parroting ideas); engagement and even daringness; moderation between too much certainty and not enough certainty Close Reading: reading beyond, beneath the surface; applying what is read to another context; connecting to larger contexts and questions Definitions: of key terms Diction: attentiveness to language Evidence: what constitutes evidence in a discipline; how one selects evidence in a disciplines (models); citation and using evidence as more that just a string of quotations; need to see one's own opinion in reference to others' opinions Grammatical Correctness: usage errors; absence of usage errors Readability: clarity, correctness, and precision Specificity: grounding generalities in details Thesis: clear sense of paper's direction Transition: between paragraphs, among ideas Understanding of place of writing: forms and traditions in a discipline |