Skidmore College

Standards and Expectations/
Writing--In-The-Disciplines Workshop III:

Creating Writing-In-The-Disciplines Resources

28 May-31 May 2002


Participants
Schedule
Writing Expectations
Discipline-Specific Characteristics
Designing Paper Assignments
Responding to Student Writing
Grading and Assessment Rubrics
Departmental Writing Pages
Resources
Home

Writing Expectations


Expectations Developed in Summer 2001 Workshop

Criteria for Assessing College Writing, 30 May 2001

Workshop participants articulated the following criteria for assessing college writing after reading and discussing a selection of course papers from LS 2 classes written by students who had completed the Expository Writing Requirement.

Audience: writing to the audience; awareness of audience; tone and vocabulary shift in response to audience

Authority: writing with a sense of certainty about the content; recognizing you can engage with and criticize the subject; critical understanding of material (more than saying just what the book said or parroting ideas); engagement and even daringness; moderation between too much certainty and not enough certainty

Close Reading: reading beyond, beneath the surface; applying what is read to another context; connecting to larger contexts and questions

Definitions: of key terms

Diction: attentiveness to language

Evidence: what constitutes evidence in a discipline; how one selects evidence in a disciplines (models); citation and using evidence as more that just a string of quotations; need to see one's own opinion in reference to others' opinions

Grammatical Correctness: usage errors; absence of usage errors

Readability: clarity, correctness, and precision

Specificity: grounding generalities in details

Thesis: clear sense of paper's direction

Transition: between paragraphs, among ideas

Understanding of place of writing: forms and traditions in a discipline