|
Citations of your sources
are vital in providing your reader a guide to where you found your information
and they help you avoid even the appearance of plagiarism. Footnotes,
endnotes, and parenthetical citations tell your readers that you have
based your writing on other sources, and distinguish your arguments, ideas,
and analyses from those of other writers. Citations also lead readers
to sources that might interest them or help them in their own work.
You should cite your sources
- when you quote directly
from a source. Words that you find in another writer's work, even one
or two words, need to be placed within quotation marks and cited in
your essay.
- when you summarize or
paraphrase someone else's ideas. Even though you put those ideas in
your own words, when you incorporate someone's analysis or interpretation
in your essay, you need to cite the source. Don't place the summary
or paraphrase in quotation marks, but provide the source just the same.
- when you refer to factual
information that is not likely to be found in other sources. If your
source gives you data or information that has resulted from specific
research, experiments, or investigations, the source should be cited.
You need not cite
sources
- when you are referring
to information that is "common knowledge" in your field. Dates, definitions,
and theories, for example, might fall under the category of common knowledge.
Information from reference sources usually is considered common knowledge.
If you are a beginner in a field and you do not know what is considered
common knowledge, it is better to cite than not cite.
- when the source is evident
from your own essay. For example, if you are writing about a particular
poem by Homer, you will need to list the work in the first citation,
but henceforth you need only provide in a footnote, endnote, or parenthetical
citation the book and line numbers of the quoted passages as you analyze
the poem. When in doubt, check with your professor.
- when you are making
your own assertions, even though you are reflecting what you have learned
from lectures, readings, and conversations with classmates and friends.
Citing Sources: Footnotes,
Endnotes and In-Line Citations
When you assign credit to a source you place that credit either within
the text (an "in-line" citation), or in a note, either at the
bottom of a page or on separate sheets at the end of the paper.
Primary Sources:
Citations from ancient sources almost NEVER cite pages from a translation
but instead provide a reference to the original source. Poetry receives
line numbers and prose receives book and chapter. With authors who only
have one work (e.g., Herodotus and Thucydides in Greek, Livy in prose),
only the name of the author is necessary.
Herodotus 6.35.2 or Hdt. 6.35.2.
- Herodotus composed only
one work which he probably did not title; since antiquity we refer to
it as the Histories. In a citation, since there is no potential
for confusion with any other work by Herodotus, one need only cite the
book ("6"), the chapter ("35"),
and, if your text separates the chapters into sections, then the section
("2"). A text in the original Greek provides
such a separation; English translations usually do not, so 6.35
would be sufficient. Note that Herodotus' name is usually abbreviated
as Hdt.
Livy 1.3 or Liv.
1.3.
- The same rules apply
for Livy as for Herodotus. His work was usually referred to as ab
urbe condita, or "(A History of Rome) from the foundation
of the city." One work means no title need be used, just the
book and chapter, etc.
Sophocles Antigone
675-705 or Soph. Ant.
675-705.
Vergil Aeneid 4.1-10
or Ver. Aen.
4.1-10.
- Sophocles, the Greek
tragedian, and Vergil (or Virgil), the Roman epic poet, each wrote multiple
works of poetry. So, the citation should include the author's name (abbreviations
are customary), the title (again, abbreviations are customary) and the
line numbers. In the reference to Sophocles' Antigone, the
passage cited are lines 675-705; the play is a single entity and is
not divided into books or chapters. In the reference to Vergil's Aeneid,
however, the line numbers ("1-10") are distinguished
as coming from the fourth book of the Aeneid ("4"),
rather than any of the other 11 books of the epic poem.
For appropriate abbreviations
consult the Oxford Classical Dictionary, ed. by S. Hornblower and
A. Spawforth, 3rd ed. (Oxford, 1996 repr.), pp.ix-xxii, or the list provided
by the Interactive
Ancient Mediterranean website (last updated in 2004).
If a primary source appears in a sourcebook, both the source and the
sourcebook should be cited:
Aristophanes Acharnians 692-701 in M. Dillon and L. Garland,
Ancient Greece: Social and Historical Documents from Archaic Times
to the Death of Socrates (c. 800-399 BC) (London and New York, 2nd
ed., 2000), 7.17.
Cicero Laws 3.3-4 in N. Lewis and M. Reinhold (eds.), Roman
Civilization. Selected Readings, Volume I: The Republic and the Augustan
Age (New York, 3rd ed., 1990), 148.
NOTE: in both citations, the volume uses a numbering system for
each text, and so you should cite them by the numbering system rather
than the page number(s).
Secondary Sources:
A quotation from a work of scholarship by M.I. Finley would be cited like
this:
M.I. Finley, The Ancient Greeks (New York and London, 1971 repr.),
pp. 9-11.
If Finley's work is cited
subsequently, the proper method is as follows:
Finley 1971, p. 169.
Articles
in a collection are cited like this:
R. Seaford, "The
Structural Problems of Marriage in Euripides," in Euripides, Women
and Sexuality, ed. A. Powell (London and New York, 1990), pp. 151-176.
J. March, "Euripides
the Misogynist?" in Euripides, Women and Sexuality, ed. A.
Powell (London and New York, 1990), pp. 32-75.
Articles in journals and
periodicals are somewhat similar yet many times have abbreviated titles.
For a list of journal abbreviations consult the Oxford Classical Dictionary,
pp. xxix-liv in the Scribner Library.
B.M.W. Knox, "The
Hippolytus of Euripides," Yale Classical Studies 13 (1952),
pp. 3-31.
More frequently cited
with the journal abbreviated as:
B.M.W. Knox, "The
Hippolytus of Euripides," YCS 13 (1952), pp. 3-31.
Subsequent citation:
Knox 1952, 7-9.
An electronic resource
citation should have cited the author, title of the webpage, the URL,
and the month and year you accessed the page. In an electronic document
the URL itself should be a link to the webpage. Here is how the bibliographic
entry should look:
G. Crane, ed., The
Perseus Project, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/atlas?sites=Sesklo
(November, 2000).
To see how all of these
citations work in a bibliography go to the bibliography
webpage. Note the differences: a bibliographic entry is a sequence
of small sections, each separated by a period, while a notation is a sequence
of small sections, each separated by a comma. |