“ ... committed for life to a policy of charismatic Machtpolitik” (Green p.140)

• The succession of Alexander
  Questions to consider: What were the qualities exhibited by Alexander in 338-4 that signified his potential to assume the throne of his father successfully? Consider his diplomatic, military, strategic and political policies, citing examples and drawing upon the primary sources as well as Green’s arguments. Which authors show particular interest in his personal virtues, and what other elements do they deemphasize accordingly? Which strategies, qualities, and gifts did he employ or exhibit that would prove essential later, and what risks did they carry?
• Alexander and the Greeks
  Questions to consider: Alexander struggled throughout his career with the Greeks, anticipating their fears, resentment and hostility. Not all of his strategic positions regarding the Greeks proved successful. Placing yourself in Alexander’s shoes, how would you characterize the Greeks? What were their strengths and vulnerabilities, and how might you wrestle with each for your ultimate goal? And, what is your ultimate goal as Alexander with regards to the Greeks?
• Challenges for Alexander

Questions to consider: What were the complex issues Alexander faced and how did he finesse these challenges? Consider challenges to his authority, his campaigns from 336-334, his solutions to funding the Persian invasion, his approach to providing for a successor, and any other events that brought his leadership skills into relief. What might he have done differently, and what outcomes would you project? What do his actions suggest about his long-term aspirations?