Healthcare Cost Work
Skidmore’s Benefits/Human Resources Team continuously strives to ensure the College’s healthcare benefits are attractive, flexible and provide choice to support the needs of employees and their families. The Team engages in initiatives to address emerging trends, manage costs, and ensure access which benefits both employees and the College who share in the cost of Skidmore’s healthcare expenses. These initiatives may result in plan design changes, program enhancements or other activities to improve the benefits experience while managing costs. Some activities also align with prudent business practices and due diligence including benchmarking and market checks to ensure that the plan offerings, funding arrangements and account services are competitive and align to current marketplace standards.
Recent initiatives include the following:
Market Checks:
- Medical (2023): The College released a Request for Proposal for the Medical plan.
An analysis of proposals determined MVP continues to be best vendor choice for the
College, offering the most attractive financial arrangements, provider network and
account service support. Continuing with MVP resulted in no disruption to existing
provider relationships for employees and their dependents while reducing the plan’s
administrative fees.
- Vision (2023): The College released a Request for Quotes for a voluntary vision plan.
The College currently offers vision coverage through its health plan. Vendors would
not offer a stand-alone voluntary plan unless vision coverage was removed from the
health plans, negatively impacting many employees and their dependents. A popular
option for additional vision expenses is for employees to utilize the Flexible Spending
Account option.
- Dental (2024): The College released a Request for Quotes for the dental plan to confirm
the premium rates and funding options are competitive. Continuing with Delta Dental
resulted in no disruption to existing provider relationships for employees and their
dependents while maintaining current rates for 2025.
- Benefits Peer Review (2024 and 2025): Segal consultants provided updated reviews of
current benefits compared to NY6 peer institutions. Skidmore’s plan design is more
generous than the comparable designs of all of the other New York Six Liberal Arts
Consortium schools. This benchmark data contributes to making benefit changes that
allow Skidmore to remain competitive offering rich benefits in the PPO plan while
aligning with the marketplace, for example for 2026, discontinuing future enrollments
in the EPO plan and providing a benefit enhancement by reducing the High-Deductible
Health Plan (HDHP) out of pocket maximum.
- EPO plan (2025): After careful analysis, Skidmore has decided to discontinue further
enrollments into the EPO MVP health plan option. As the EPO and PPO MVP health plans
have adjusted over time, there are now minimal differences between the options and
employees are overwhelmingly selecting the PPO and HDHP plans. The PPO plan offers
out-of-network coverage not available to EPO plan participants. This change will streamline
benefits communication and enrollment processes with new and current employees, as
well as increase efficiency between plan participants and MVP. Approximately 45 employees
are currently enrolled in the EPO plan, After the fall 2025 Open Enrollment period,
Skidmore will assess EPO plan enrollment during 2026 to determine whether the plan
will continue to be offered in 2027.
- Skidmore participates in a pharmacy coalition comprised of a group of higher education institutions that have banded together to gain purchasing power and negotiating strength. Within the coalition, price negotiation and periodic reviews of our pharmacy benefit manager arrangement are performed.
FAQS-General Questions
Extremely favorable. The Healthcare Working Group considered a large amount of comparison data as part of its work in 2019-2021. Data comparing Skidmore’s plan to our peer/aspirant institutions was also shared with the IPPC and the broader community in the spring of 2019. For example, we know that Skidmore’s current plan design is more generous than the comparable designs of all of the other New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium schools. Data from this group was revisited in 2024 with the same result.
Please note that beyond the “New York Six” we have also benchmarked Skidmore’s health plan against other peer and aspirant schools such as Vassar College, Middlebury College, Davidson College, Bowdoin College, and other members of the group known as the “Colgate Group” of competitive liberal arts schools. Additionally, we have benchmarked against other higher education institutions in the New York capital region. The result of these additional comparison is essentially the same i.e. Skidmore’s plan design is more generous and employees pay a lower average cost share than our peer and aspirant institutions.
Premiums and Employee Cost Sharing
Because Skidmore’s healthcare plan is a self-insured one, as opposed to a fully-insured one, the College does not pay premiums to a vendor to provide healthcare coverage to faculty and staff. Instead, the College pays claims costs as they are incurred. We see MVP on our insurance cards, and this is because MVP administers our plan (but is not our insurer). The advantages of having a self-insured plan include having great flexibility over plan design and eliminating the profit that would need be paid to an insurer thereby saving the College money.
One big disadvantage of a self-insured plan, however, is the volatility of claims’ expenses (both in terms of quantity and severity). We take steps to mitigate this volatility, namely as it related to high-cost claims, by having stop loss insurance. With stop loss insurance, when a single claim exceeds a pre-determined amount, that insurance covers those excess claims costs.
Since the College is not paying a premium to an insurance vendor, the College must instead calculate what is known as a premium equivalent rate. This calculation is done in order to establish cost sharing – specifically, what share of the healthcare plan’s cost is to be covered by the College and what share of the cost is to be covered by the employee. Premium equivalent rates should align closely with our plan’s actual cost, thereby reflecting reality. When premium equivalent rates are set in the fall, at open enrollment time for implementation on January 1st, we must approximate the years healthcare costs based on actual year-to-date claims and estimated claims for the balance of the year.
In recent years, actual healthcare claims costs have risen at rates that are greater than that of our premium equivalent rates. For the current year, for example, the College committed to capping premium equivalent rate increases at 6%, despite the data indicating that to be reflective of actual plan cost, an increase of 13% would have been more in line with reality.